Shield) rein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required hinein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met rein forward facing CRSs with restraining https://numberfields.asu.edu/NumberFields/show_user.php?userid=5173156